HonestBlog: March 2012

IF I'M HONEST... SHE HITS YOU,
THEN HIT THE B***H BACK

Written By Joseph Richardson

If I'm honest... HIT HER BACK. This may be my most controversial blog to DATE, drum rolls please maestro, and I am still in two MINDS as to the way to deal with this ISSUE. To go for my TONGUE-IN-CHEEK humor, or to deal with it in a DEADLY serious manner. All I do know is, this is a serious issue and one that DOES need to be given ATTENTION but what the HECK my HUMOR adds some VA-VA VOOM to the BLOG.

Now seen as SOME people at times are more than happy to JUMP down my throat and draw CONCLUSIONS from what I'm saying PREJUDICED with the view to HATING me. I am going to OUTLINE my intentions first and make them BRIEF, BOLD AND CONCLUSIVE.

Brief, Bold and Conclusive

THIS IS NOT AN ARTICLE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

I DO NOT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND AGAINST MAN OR WOMAN.

I DO NOT THINK MEN OR WOMEN HAVE MORE OR LESS RIGHTS IN REGARDS TO VIOLENCE AND HOW THEY ARE DEALT WITH BY THE LAW.

IT IS NOT ABOUT MEN HAVING TO 'MAN UP' BUT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST ATTACK.

and...

I DO NOT WANT MEN USING MY WORDS AS AN EXCUSE FOR HITTING A GIRL/ BEATING UP THEIR PARTNERS... THIS IS NOT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT AND IF YOU THINK IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ATTACK YOUR PARTNER- MALE OR FEMALE, YOU DESERVE TO ROT IN PRISON ACCOMPANIED BY JOSEF FRITZEL.

What It Is About

UNPROVOKED ATTACKS BY FEMALES ON MALES.

WHY MEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES IF ATTACKED BY A WOMAN/ WOMEN BY ANY MEANS HE DEEMS NECESSARY.

TO ERADICATE ANY ILLUSIONS THAT WOMEN CAN HIT/BEHAVE IN ANY WAY THEY FEEL TOWARDS A MAN WITHOUT ANY REPERCUSSIONS BASED ON GENDER.

WHAT CAN WE DEEM AS SUITABLE FORCE FOR DEALING WITH UNPROVOKED FEMALE ATTACKS.

Consider

The reason hitting a woman back is frowned upon is because of SIZE and STRENGTH. It is assumed that across the board all men are HE-MAN and all females are a DAMSEL IN DISTRESS. However if we are honest this is not the case, look at the cast of former AUSTRALIAN hit prison series PRISONER CELL BLOCK H, the MAJORITY of them are the same size as the AVERAGE man and I know for a fact if one of them hit me right, I'd be picking my TEETH out of the GUTTER... AGAIN as it were.. The size and strength of each man differs just as it is with FEMALES and all SPECIES. So lets ERADICATE that EXCUSE NOW.

Also are FEMALES able to do the following things?

THINK before they ACT and assess a SITUATION?
WEIGH UP the PROS and CONS of their ACTIONS?
Are INTELLIGENT beings able to use own CONSCIOUS thought on DECISIONS?
Are RESPONSIBLE enough to be held ACCOUNTABLE for their ACTIONS?
Are TREATED with the same EQUALITY as MEN in SOCIETY?

If yes to any of these answers, then a WOMAN has the ability of a CLEAR THOUGHT PROCESS and accepts that if she does decide to ATTACK a man, he is most LIKELY going to be STRONGER and could PROBABLY cause more DAMAGE, if that is the case, then she should take her own INTRINSIC WARNINGS, and consider WHETHER or not an UNPROVOKED ATTACK on a MAN is the right COURSE OF ACTION.

MEN and WOMEN are both capable of CLARITY OF THOUGHT so if you consider 2 MEN having a DIFFERENCE of opinion. ONE is 70KG and 5 foot 9 the other is 120KG and 6 foot 4. The 5 foot 9 GUY is the one with the problem and causing the trouble, the BIGGER guy is ABSOLVED of any wrong doing. Will the smaller GUY immediately jump into FISTICUFFS with the BIGGER GUY? NO he WON'T. He will have CONSIDERED all factors, accept he is at a DISADVANTAGE across the BOARD and will probably just walk off kicking the floor and HURLING ABUSE. If he does throw the FIRST PUNCH, then he accepts he is ACCOUNTABLE for his ACTIONS and RESPECTS that he may not be STANDING on his feet for too much longer. The BIG GUY has the right to DEFEND himself no matter what. The same can be APPLIED to MALE and FEMALE encounters as women are able to conduct the same assessments on a situation as ANY man.

So have we REACHED a point where we need to put together some form of COMMANDMENTS if you will, that OUTLINES to what length a MAN is allowed to go to, to DEFEND himself from an ATTACK by a FEMALE?

The Few Bad Eggs Of The Female Population

I see all too often on NIGHTS OUT rows firing up around dance-floors because a girl thinks a guy looked at her the WRONG way or he may have passed an off hand comment about the RIPENESS of her DERRIERE. And there is a large amount of TENDENCY by a SMALL PORTION of the FEMALE POPULATION... NOT EVERY FEMALE!!! ( Had to add that because STEREOTYPING on this subject I'm sure will only result in my untimely CASTRATION.) To run in GUNG-HO with their FISTS flying, CLAWS sharpened and TONGUE hissing because they know a guy cannot FIGHT back due to MORAL OBLIGATIONS.

Now if it was the case that the entire population REACTED VIOLENTLY to every off hand comment they received from a MAN or WOMAN, or LASHED out because they thought someone was giving them a DIRTY LOOK. I'm sure the NHS would now be refusing to come to our ATTENDANCE due to the HEIGHTENING costs on repairing many BROKEN NOSES and KNUCKLES. So why do these GIRLS think they have the right to resort to VIOLENCE IMMEDIATELY? Just because its a GUY who has said something SLIGHTLY off-hand or in many cases SAID and DONE NOTHING AT ALL?

Would she be so willing to attack if it was a FEMALE who looked at her funny??? Or would she just turn to a FRIEND and remark under her breath, 'Urgh did you see the way the B***H looked at me???'

The Awkward Moment

As a girl ATTACKS, the guy often has an AWKWARD moment where he does not have a clue what to do at this point. Does HE stand there and get BATTERED, BRUISED, SCRATCHED, purely because of what gender he was born? Or does he ACTUALLY take action, knocking the girl to the GROUND or giving her a SLAP back? What will his friends think if he gets KNOCKED out by a GIRL? What will EVERYONE think if he PROTECTS himself? Does he WALK AWAY? Or think WHY should I have to be the one to WALK AWAY? Should I choose ARMANI CODE from the toilet attendant for a Pound or DAVIDOFF COOL WATER? Are just some of the questions running through his head at this point. If you imagine this along with fitting music, some SLOW MOTION animation and a VOICE-OVER, it would be an ARCHETYPAL CINEMATIC MOMENT.

The Morale Dilemma

What makes this such a tough issue is MORAL obligations. I don't think MORALITY has developed at the same rate as what EQUALITY and the LAW has. In the PAST women were treated as the FAIRER sex, DAINTY, WEAK, EMOTIONALLY INDULGENT, whereas the man was TOUGH, the BREAD WINNER, the PROTECTOR.

In recent times though WOMEN have proven that they are just as EMOTIONALLY strong, that they can be BREAD WINNERS, that they can survive ALONE and RAISE A FAMILY. Women now have the RIGHT TO VOTE, EARN the same INCOME as men, have the SAME JOBS as men, COMPETE in SPORTS like men, WEAR and SAY whatever they like, and are free to make THEIR OWN DECISIONS.

Now this is FANTASTIC!!! It should have never been that WOMEN did not have EQUAL RIGHTS and thank god the VIEWS and the LEGISLATION'S preventing women from being EQUAL have been ABOLISHED. However with RIGHTS come RESPONSIBILITIES.

If women now have all the same RIGHTS as MEN, then they must accept that they are to be TREATED like MEN. That means if you are GOING to attack a man, do not think for a second you are ABOVE the law and that you are provided with SANCTITY from being HIT back. It does not WORK LIKE THAT. The image of the DAINTY FEMALE has long gone.

Why we have to change

As with most cases in life, if there is a LACK of DISCIPLINE or RESPECT some people will abuse their POWER. If this TREND in female BEHAVIOR continues to GROW and action or some form of RIPOSTE to the SITUATION is not DEVELOPED, it will only get worse for guys. If a HARD-LINE is taken now, it will minimize further ATTACKS and violence in the future, DEFUSING a lot of SITUATIONS. In a sense working like NUCLEAR DETERRENTS.

So lets try to reach a common ground that is acceptable across all the boards between both genders.

The BETA Scale And Forceometer Monitor

1) GIRL SLAPS GUY ACROSS FACE- response- EQUAL AND PROPORTIONATE

2) GIRL PUNCHES GUY IN FACE AND SCRATCHES- response- EQUAL AND PROPORTIONATE

3) MULTIPLE FEMALES- response- You can HIT them and Knock them out- If they are willing to attack for no reason, IF they manage to KNOCK YOU OUT, whose to stay they will STOP at that point and won't start stomping down once you are on the FLOOR. Remember between LIFE, DEATH and MORALITY, what is more IMPORTANT?

4) FEMALES WITH WEAPONS- response- DO WHATEVER THE F**K IT TAKES.

I think the key to remember is that if we are EQUAL, if you are slapped, then you have the right to SLAP HER BACK. The same if a GUY PUNCHES another GUY.

Why I care

I think the main REASONING for my INTEREST in this subject matter is because GUYS get such a hard time from the PRESS and FEMALES regarding their BEHAVIOR. We are often deemed PLAYERS, D**KH***S and MIND F***S, but it seems like we are the ones with PRINCIPLES. Most guys S**T themselves at the thought of having to defend themselves against a female, and I totally UNDERSTAND why. Because it does feel wrong to hit someone WEAKER than you.

But whilst ever these B****S and that's what the name is for this MINORITY of women I am discussing, and lets not sugar coat it. Think they can do WHATEVER they please, its only going to make life harder for MEN.

My arguments for hitting back

1) Its an EQUAL RIGHTS society. This means we are treat as EQUALS in all walks of life.

2) SIZE AND STRENGTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE MALE OR FEMALE.

3) One punch in the WRONG place can kill you, one SCRATCH in the WRONG place can BLIND you, if anyone, male or female thinks another human is going to accept coming worse off and jeopardize their life for the sake of MORALITY, THINK AGAIN

4) If you are BIG ENOUGH TO THROW A PUNCH, YOU ARE BIG ENOUGH TO TAKE ONE.

5) Why does the GUY have to be the bigger man and walk away? GENERALLY if someone tries to WALKAWAY from a fight, the ATTACKERS continue their PURSUIT usually blinded by ANGER and INTOXICATION. IT IS NOT SAFE TO JUST WALK AWAY.

6) EVERYONE has a RIGHT to DEFEND themselves.

7) It is up to the person who has been ATTACKED to deem what is an APPROPRIATE response, not those around.

8) NO ONE should feel OBLIGED to be KNOCKED OUT because his ATTACKER appears WEAKER.

9) It is a COWARDS way of thinking that they have the RIGHT to hit someone bigger, and EXPECT not to RECEIVE a slap BACK.

The Answer

Now for the WOMEN that do behave in this MANOR and THANK GOD they are in the MINORITY. And for those that think it is ACCEPTABLE to ABUSE men and receive no REPERCUSSIONS for their TRANSGRESSIONS. Here is my suggestion...

HERE IS SOME FAIRY WASHING UP LIQUID...

HERE ARE SOME WASHING UP GLOVES...

HERE IS A KITCHEN...

HERE ARE SOME DIRTY POTS...

GO BACK TO THE KITCHENS, YOU DO NOT DESERVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS MEN AS YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF A MAN.

AND FORGET A DISH WASHER, YOU DON'T DESERVE ONE!!!

ONCE AGAIN THIS IS NOT ABOUT PROMOTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN. IT IS ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF MEN TO DEFEND THEMSELVES IF THEY HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED REGARDLESS OF SEX.

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE ISSUE AND WHAT I HAVE DISCUSSED IN NO WAY PROMOTES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS MY VIEW IS ANYONE USING VIOLENCE, SHOULD BE IMPRISONED.

JUST BECAUSE I HAVE STATED THAT A MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO HIT A WOMAN BACK IF ATTACKED, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT I LOOK FOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO HIT WOMEN, I ATTEMPT TO AVOID IT ALL COSTS AND HAVE NEVER HIT A WOMAN IN MY LIFE THUS FAR, EVEN WHEN ASSAULTED.

THANK YOU FOR READING AND STAY TUNED FOR MORE BLOGS. IF YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON WHAT YOU HAVE READ PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT BELOW.

HonestBlog

Wednesday 7 March 2012

IF I'M HONEST... STOP DICTATORS 2012

Tuesday 6 March 2012

IF I'M HONEST... HIT HER BACK!!!