IF I'M HONEST... SHE HITS YOU,
THEN HIT THE B***H BACK
THEN HIT THE B***H BACK
Written By Joseph Richardson

Brief, Bold and Conclusive
THIS IS NOT AN ARTICLE ON DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.
I DO NOT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY KIND AGAINST MAN OR WOMAN.
I DO NOT THINK MEN OR WOMEN HAVE MORE OR LESS RIGHTS IN REGARDS TO VIOLENCE AND HOW THEY ARE DEALT WITH BY THE LAW.
IT IS NOT ABOUT MEN HAVING TO 'MAN UP' BUT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST ATTACK.
IT IS NOT ABOUT MEN HAVING TO 'MAN UP' BUT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST ATTACK.
and...
I DO NOT WANT MEN USING MY WORDS AS AN EXCUSE FOR HITTING A GIRL/ BEATING UP THEIR PARTNERS... THIS IS NOT WHAT THIS IS ABOUT AND IF YOU THINK IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO ATTACK YOUR PARTNER- MALE OR FEMALE, YOU DESERVE TO ROT IN PRISON ACCOMPANIED BY JOSEF FRITZEL.
UNPROVOKED ATTACKS BY FEMALES ON MALES.
WHY MEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEFEND THEMSELVES IF ATTACKED BY A WOMAN/ WOMEN BY ANY MEANS HE DEEMS NECESSARY.
TO ERADICATE ANY ILLUSIONS THAT WOMEN CAN HIT/BEHAVE IN ANY WAY THEY FEEL TOWARDS A MAN WITHOUT ANY REPERCUSSIONS BASED ON GENDER.
WHAT CAN WE DEEM AS SUITABLE FORCE FOR DEALING WITH UNPROVOKED FEMALE ATTACKS.
Consider
The reason hitting a woman back is frowned upon is because of SIZE and STRENGTH. It is assumed that across the board all men are HE-MAN and all females are a DAMSEL IN DISTRESS. However if we are honest this is not the case, look at the cast of former AUSTRALIAN hit prison series PRISONER CELL BLOCK H, the MAJORITY of them are the same size as the AVERAGE man and I know for a fact if one of them hit me right, I'd be picking my TEETH out of the GUTTER... AGAIN as it were.. The size and strength of each man differs just as it is with FEMALES and all SPECIES. So lets ERADICATE that EXCUSE NOW.
Also are FEMALES able to do the following things?
THINK before they ACT and assess a SITUATION?
WEIGH UP the PROS and CONS of their ACTIONS?
Are INTELLIGENT beings able to use own CONSCIOUS thought on DECISIONS?
Are RESPONSIBLE enough to be held ACCOUNTABLE for their ACTIONS?
Are TREATED with the same EQUALITY as MEN in SOCIETY?
If yes to any of these answers, then a WOMAN has the ability of a CLEAR THOUGHT PROCESS and accepts that if she does decide to ATTACK a man, he is most LIKELY going to be STRONGER and could PROBABLY cause more DAMAGE, if that is the case, then she should take her own INTRINSIC WARNINGS, and consider WHETHER or not an UNPROVOKED ATTACK on a MAN is the right COURSE OF ACTION.
MEN and WOMEN are both capable of CLARITY OF THOUGHT so if you consider 2 MEN having a DIFFERENCE of opinion. ONE is 70KG and 5 foot 9 the other is 120KG and 6 foot 4. The 5 foot 9 GUY is the one with the problem and causing the trouble, the BIGGER guy is ABSOLVED of any wrong doing. Will the smaller GUY immediately jump into FISTICUFFS with the BIGGER GUY? NO he WON'T. He will have CONSIDERED all factors, accept he is at a DISADVANTAGE across the BOARD and will probably just walk off kicking the floor and HURLING ABUSE. If he does throw the FIRST PUNCH, then he accepts he is ACCOUNTABLE for his ACTIONS and RESPECTS that he may not be STANDING on his feet for too much longer. The BIG GUY has the right to DEFEND himself no matter what. The same can be APPLIED to MALE and FEMALE encounters as women are able to conduct the same assessments on a situation as ANY man.
So have we REACHED a point where we need to put together some form of COMMANDMENTS if you will, that OUTLINES to what length a MAN is allowed to go to, to DEFEND himself from an ATTACK by a FEMALE?
Consider
The reason hitting a woman back is frowned upon is because of SIZE and STRENGTH. It is assumed that across the board all men are HE-MAN and all females are a DAMSEL IN DISTRESS. However if we are honest this is not the case, look at the cast of former AUSTRALIAN hit prison series PRISONER CELL BLOCK H, the MAJORITY of them are the same size as the AVERAGE man and I know for a fact if one of them hit me right, I'd be picking my TEETH out of the GUTTER... AGAIN as it were.. The size and strength of each man differs just as it is with FEMALES and all SPECIES. So lets ERADICATE that EXCUSE NOW.
Also are FEMALES able to do the following things?
THINK before they ACT and assess a SITUATION?
WEIGH UP the PROS and CONS of their ACTIONS?
Are INTELLIGENT beings able to use own CONSCIOUS thought on DECISIONS?
Are RESPONSIBLE enough to be held ACCOUNTABLE for their ACTIONS?
Are TREATED with the same EQUALITY as MEN in SOCIETY?
MEN and WOMEN are both capable of CLARITY OF THOUGHT so if you consider 2 MEN having a DIFFERENCE of opinion. ONE is 70KG and 5 foot 9 the other is 120KG and 6 foot 4. The 5 foot 9 GUY is the one with the problem and causing the trouble, the BIGGER guy is ABSOLVED of any wrong doing. Will the smaller GUY immediately jump into FISTICUFFS with the BIGGER GUY? NO he WON'T. He will have CONSIDERED all factors, accept he is at a DISADVANTAGE across the BOARD and will probably just walk off kicking the floor and HURLING ABUSE. If he does throw the FIRST PUNCH, then he accepts he is ACCOUNTABLE for his ACTIONS and RESPECTS that he may not be STANDING on his feet for too much longer. The BIG GUY has the right to DEFEND himself no matter what. The same can be APPLIED to MALE and FEMALE encounters as women are able to conduct the same assessments on a situation as ANY man.
So have we REACHED a point where we need to put together some form of COMMANDMENTS if you will, that OUTLINES to what length a MAN is allowed to go to, to DEFEND himself from an ATTACK by a FEMALE?
The Few Bad Eggs Of The Female Population
Now if it was the case that the entire population REACTED VIOLENTLY to every off hand comment they received from a MAN or WOMAN, or LASHED out because they thought someone was giving them a DIRTY LOOK. I'm sure the NHS would now be refusing to come to our ATTENDANCE due to the HEIGHTENING costs on repairing many BROKEN NOSES and KNUCKLES. So why do these GIRLS think they have the right to resort to VIOLENCE IMMEDIATELY? Just because its a GUY who has said something SLIGHTLY off-hand or in many cases SAID and DONE NOTHING AT ALL?
Would she be so willing to attack if it was a FEMALE who looked at her funny??? Or would she just turn to a FRIEND and remark under her breath, 'Urgh did you see the way the B***H looked at me???'
The Awkward Moment
The Morale Dilemma
In recent times though WOMEN have proven that they are just as EMOTIONALLY strong, that they can be BREAD WINNERS, that they can survive ALONE and RAISE A FAMILY. Women now have the RIGHT TO VOTE, EARN the same INCOME as men, have the SAME JOBS as men, COMPETE in SPORTS like men, WEAR and SAY whatever they like, and are free to make THEIR OWN DECISIONS.
Now this is FANTASTIC!!! It should have never been that WOMEN did not have EQUAL RIGHTS and thank god the VIEWS and the LEGISLATION'S preventing women from being EQUAL have been ABOLISHED. However with RIGHTS come RESPONSIBILITIES.
If women now have all the same RIGHTS as MEN, then they must accept that they are to be TREATED like MEN. That means if you are GOING to attack a man, do not think for a second you are ABOVE the law and that you are provided with SANCTITY from being HIT back. It does not WORK LIKE THAT. The image of the DAINTY FEMALE has long gone.
Why we have to change
As with most cases in life, if there is a LACK of DISCIPLINE or RESPECT some people will abuse their POWER. If this TREND in female BEHAVIOR continues to GROW and action or some form of RIPOSTE to the SITUATION is not DEVELOPED, it will only get worse for guys. If a HARD-LINE is taken now, it will minimize further ATTACKS and violence in the future, DEFUSING a lot of SITUATIONS. In a sense working like NUCLEAR DETERRENTS.
The BETA Scale And Forceometer Monitor
1) GIRL SLAPS GUY ACROSS FACE- response- EQUAL AND PROPORTIONATE
2) GIRL PUNCHES GUY IN FACE AND SCRATCHES- response- EQUAL AND PROPORTIONATE
4) FEMALES WITH WEAPONS- response- DO WHATEVER THE F**K IT TAKES.
I think the key to remember is that if we are EQUAL, if you are slapped, then you have the right to SLAP HER BACK. The same if a GUY PUNCHES another GUY.
Why I care
I think the main REASONING for my INTEREST in this subject matter is because GUYS get such a hard time from the PRESS and FEMALES regarding their BEHAVIOR. We are often deemed PLAYERS, D**KH***S and MIND F***S, but it seems like we are the ones with PRINCIPLES. Most guys S**T themselves at the thought of having to defend themselves against a female, and I totally UNDERSTAND why. Because it does feel wrong to hit someone WEAKER than you.
But whilst ever these B****S and that's what the name is for this MINORITY of women I am discussing, and lets not sugar coat it. Think they can do WHATEVER they please, its only going to make life harder for MEN.
My arguments for hitting back
2) SIZE AND STRENGTH IS NOT AN EXCUSE MALE OR FEMALE.
3) One punch in the WRONG place can kill you, one SCRATCH in the WRONG place can BLIND you, if anyone, male or female thinks another human is going to accept coming worse off and jeopardize their life for the sake of MORALITY, THINK AGAIN
4) If you are BIG ENOUGH TO THROW A PUNCH, YOU ARE BIG ENOUGH TO TAKE ONE.
5) Why does the GUY have to be the bigger man and walk away? GENERALLY if someone tries to WALKAWAY from a fight, the ATTACKERS continue their PURSUIT usually blinded by ANGER and INTOXICATION. IT IS NOT SAFE TO JUST WALK AWAY.
6) EVERYONE has a RIGHT to DEFEND themselves.

8) NO ONE should feel OBLIGED to be KNOCKED OUT because his ATTACKER appears WEAKER.
9) It is a COWARDS way of thinking that they have the RIGHT to hit someone bigger, and EXPECT not to RECEIVE a slap BACK.
The Answer
9) It is a COWARDS way of thinking that they have the RIGHT to hit someone bigger, and EXPECT not to RECEIVE a slap BACK.
The Answer
HERE IS SOME FAIRY WASHING UP LIQUID...
GO BACK TO THE KITCHENS, YOU DO NOT DESERVE THE SAME RIGHTS AS MEN AS YOU ARE NOT WILLING TO ACCEPT THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF A MAN.
AND FORGET A DISH WASHER, YOU DON'T DESERVE ONE!!!
ONCE AGAIN THIS IS NOT ABOUT PROMOTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN. IT IS ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF MEN TO DEFEND THEMSELVES IF THEY HAVE BEEN ASSAULTED REGARDLESS OF SEX.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IS AN ENTIRELY SEPARATE ISSUE AND WHAT I HAVE DISCUSSED IN NO WAY PROMOTES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS MY VIEW IS ANYONE USING VIOLENCE, SHOULD BE IMPRISONED.
JUST BECAUSE I HAVE STATED THAT A MAN HAS THE RIGHT TO HIT A WOMAN BACK IF ATTACKED, IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT I LOOK FOR AN OPPORTUNITY TO HIT WOMEN, I ATTEMPT TO AVOID IT ALL COSTS AND HAVE NEVER HIT A WOMAN IN MY LIFE THUS FAR, EVEN WHEN ASSAULTED.
THANK YOU FOR READING AND STAY TUNED FOR MORE BLOGS. IF YOU HAVE ANY THOUGHTS ON WHAT YOU HAVE READ PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT BELOW.
If a woman hit me I'd smack her back.. I hate it when women think they can hit a man and get away with it cause they are the weaker sex. If they're the weaker sex then they should know better not to hit a man. Simples :)
ReplyDeleteLargely, women will be weaker than men, so it would be concern to restrain them, rather than resorting to violence.
ReplyDeleteOur police work at restraining criminals, not beating the shit out of them, so for you to say to hit back purely because other scenarios dictate that, is morally wrong. Of course, it's not right for a woman to hit a man, but you could say the same for children. If your kid slapped you, would you feel obliged to smack them across the face, because it's 'fair'?
Interesting attempt at a credible argument, but not well executed.
I think a man should only hit a woman in very extreme cases but in all other cases he should use light methods to defend/protect himself from the woman; just like, I believe, no fully grown adult should hit a child with great force despite their actions. I think it's part of our inherent hardwiring as animals to instinctively defend or protect those most vulnerable in society so after the elderly, the disabled, infants/children follows women and then men hence why you felt the need to state: "I ... HAVE NEVER HIT A WOMAN IN MY LIFE THUS FAR, EVEN WHEN ASSAULTED. " I think your blog is thought provoking - you should keep writing!
ReplyDeleteI am a woman, and actually, I agree with some of this. Equal rights. I do not believe in domestic violence and men physically abusing women just for the sake of it or their sadistic pleasure - people like that are despicable scum - but I DO believe that if a woman attacks a man for no reason, he should have every right to defend himself/put her in her place if she is completely out-of-control and full on attacking. I mean, if your life is in danger, you would definitely do anything to survive - the instinct will take over and you will 'fight for your life' literally, whether the, say, armed, attacker is male or female. Hope this made sense. This was an interesting post you wrote. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI'm female and I too agree that if a woman wants to hit a man she should expect the same back to her.
ReplyDeleteWell done to the man in the video lol - she was about the same size as him, if not just a bit shorter.